| Appeal Processes
Available to IRHR Doctoral Students Procedures
for resolving problems and disputes involving IRHR doctoral students
differ depending on the domain of activity involved, as follows:
Employment: Issues related to on-campus employment
are governed by the collective bargaining agreement between the
university and the Rutgers AAUP Council effective at the time of
the dispute.
Grades: Students wishing to file a complaint about
a course grade or a grade received for a particular piece of work
in a course should first attempt to resolve the matter through discussion
with the instructor. If the issue cannot be satisfactorily resolved
between the student and the instructor, the student may specify
in writing the basis for the complaint and request a review by the
graduate director of the program offering the course. A written
complaint about a grade for work completed while the course is in
progress must be submitted to the graduate director no later than
two weeks after notification of the grade. A student must submit
a written complaint about a final course grade to the graduate director
no later than four weeks after the end of the exam period for that
term.
.
For IRHR course offerings, the graduate director and Ph.D. policy
committee serve as the committee on student appeals. Usually the
committee considers recommending a change of grade only if they
determine that the faculty member engaged in unprofessional conduct
or used unfair procedures to assign the grade. Written notification
of their decision will be sent to the student within four weeks
of the filing of the appeal, excluding those weeks in which classes
are not in regular session.
A student who wishes to appeal the decision of the committee may
do so by writing to the Office of the Dean of the Graduate School
– New Brunswick (GS – NB). Written notification of the
final action taken by the Office of the Dean will be sent to the
student within four weeks of the filing of the appeal, excluding
those weeks in which classes are not in regular session.
Academic Standing: Students who believe that there
has been a violation of any of the formal policies and procedures
governing the IRHR doctoral program (excluding course grades and
employment issues) are encouraged to first discuss the situation
with the graduate director and other members of the Ph.D. policy
committee (this is not required in order to preserve the student's
right to appeal, however). If these discussions do not resolve the
student's concerns, he or she may file a written appeal with the
graduate director and the Ph.D. policy committee, who serve as the
committee for student appeals. The graduate director and Ph.D. policy
committee consult with relevant parties and make a decision about
how to resolve the problem. The decision must be sent to the student
in writing within 21 working days from the date of the appeal, excluding
those weeks in which classes are not in regular session. Normally,
this decision is taken as final. Nevertheless, if a student believes
that the process by which the committee reached its decision was
unfair, he or she may file a written appeal with the Dean of the
Graduate School – New Brunswick. The procedures that will
be used for such student academic appeals are described in the GS
– NB Catalog.
|